LS Lessons I've Learned

After numerous lengthy posts to help him be more educated, it looks like Tramp has another lesson learned.

From the Safe Sex forum, HIV thread:

“You are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. I list facts. You list opinion. I have backed mine up with numbers. You have backed yours up with, I'm right, your wrong, nanny nanny boo boo.”

Which leads us to:

#36: Don’t be a bigger idiot than you already are.

On a side note, maybe BT posting in the “quotes” thread, about ‘letting people believe your an idiot before removing doubt’ , wasn’t coincidental. Maybe someone can check on it and report back if they interpret if what BT saw was coming forth.

:-D

~Allen

"Who is Allen? "

AR: The guy Tramp has an evident mancrush on, after creating this thread to reflect on his deeper emotions of being a servient, subordinate and let's not forget to be closer with his feminine cuck self.

I may just list that vast amount of mental real-estate owned! lol

~Allen

"Who is Allen?"

Nobody really.

" All of that aside, I can see how the timing of some of my silly Lessons could easily been taken by someone to be targeting something that they've recently said.

In part, this might actually be true in the sense that conversations I read will continue to be a good source of reminding me of experiences and/or just giving me inspiration for a silly thought.

With that in mind, I've thought of a way where I can maybe minimize the friction. I've started a little google note pad that I can use as scratch paper for these thoughts. That way, I can hold the new ideas (if they come from a recent forum converstation) for a few days.

I think that will help.

Tramp"

Oh hell no. Drink more, and fire away. If you stop to think about it, then it isn't real.

Who is Allen?

"The truth is that personalities develop over time here and inevitably, some of those personalities clash. We've all been a part of that somewhere along the line, and I'm certain that it will not change."

And I think everyone sucks. None of you are real. You're all just bots created by the NWO to torment me.

"Lesson No. 30:

Good or bad, you treat people the way you do because of who you are, not because of who they are."

Wrong. It's both. It's always a combination of both.

Nice Tramp.
FWIW, regardless of age Lady is f’n hawtttttttt.

Jus’ sayin’. ;^)

LS Lessons No. 35:

Women know precisely how old or young they are. There is absolutely no way that you can remind them of this fact and it improve your position...no way.

If your are 20 yrs younger than the woman you are contacting, you needn't inform her that you like older women. This fact is already made apparent by the fact that you are 30, she is 50, and you are writing to her in an effort to gain her interest.

And whatever you do, don't qualify her appearance by telling her that she looks good for her age. If she looks good, she just looks good.

Trying to be creative by using words/phrases like, mature, experienced, and God fordid...seasoned, will not improve matters.

Some don't care, but most do not appreciate attempts to highlight the obvious.

If you find a woman desirable, then simply focus on that alone and tell her why. This is simply one of the many things that does not improve with age (pun intended).

“I doubt seriously that I could get three folks from these forums together to go help me collect a winning lottery ticket...”

I seem to recall you getting three asshats and an ass-ette together in NOLA. Oh wait, that was Lady.

;^D

~S~

Yes, of course. Both of those were WAY more popular than Duck, Duck, Gray Duck.

And don't tell me it's Duck, Duck, Goose either. I'm from MN, we call it by the correct name.

What? No BBwars or JartCatch games?

I have fond memories of playing Red Rover. Dodgebrick, not so much.

Pretty sure there's a lesson there somewhere.

Well, that's good. I was starting to get a complexion about the whole, being left out thing. I think it stems from all those years of being picked last for Red Rover...

BT

BT my friend, I doubt seriously that I could get three folks from these forums together to go help me collect a winning lottery ticket...let alone anything else.

But Sunshine seems to think I've tried. I've all but begged him to go ahead and throw ole Tramp under the bus, but he ain't bite'n.

I've even promised to admit/confirm any true accusations he wants to throw my way, but he ain't bite'n.

Truth is, I probably jump at the chance to confirmed that I called him a jackass (or worse) to someone, cause I've certainly done that enough right here in these forums, but alas...he ain't bite'n. ;^D

Tramp?...

Did you call a meetin' of the posse without including me?? I'm hurt...I feel so left out... Much like Charlie Brown on Halloween... I feel like I got a rock.

I don't mean to nag, but is it because my horse is old and don't trot like he used to?

BT

Allen, dear. If you have something to say (or show), by all means....just do it already. Lmfao.

It's been 45 days since you made a post in this thread. A thread BTW which I created to talk about everything in this world other than you.

Now...

I make another post and here you show up with a little more of your baby talk.

Please, be my guest and show or talk about whatever conspiracy theory you believe you've unearthed.

If you're not bold enough to do that then just ask ole Tramp a direct question. The last time you tried that was 6/15/17 and I spanked your little fanny real quick for ya. Within 4 posts you'd hit the block button and sashay'd away with your tail tucked between your skirt.

But please...be my guest.

Has the OP posted a lesson learned about being careful when gathering a posse to target someone because it’s a small world and your cellular text and emails can be screenshot and passed around?

:-)

LS Lessons No. 34:

Keep your eye on the ball, and remember to "dance with tha one that brung ya."

Too many times folks get impatient and try to get too many irons in the fire at one time. Things get overlapped by doing that and unnecessary conflicts result.

Resist the temptation to double/triple book in an attempt to increase your chances. Focus rather on one thing at a time. Your guests will appreciate your focused attention.

Ever meet someone at a club and while half-heartedly talking with you they are constantly surveying the room for better opportunities?

Don't do that.

@Crazy4Us2: I can understand why you might wonder as to the arguement you saw, as well as your name being mentioned.

However, like BT said, you had nothing to do with it apart from asking a question.

The truth is that personalities develop over time here and inevitably, some of those personalities clash. We've all been a part of that somewhere along the line, and I'm certain that it will not change.

All of that aside, I can see how the timing of some of my silly Lessons could easily been taken by someone to be targeting something that they've recently said.

In part, this might actually be true in the sense that conversations I read will continue to be a good source of reminding me of experiences and/or just giving me inspiration for a silly thought.

With that in mind, I've thought of a way where I can maybe minimize the friction. I've started a little google note pad that I can use as scratch paper for these thoughts. That way, I can hold the new ideas (if they come from a recent forum converstation) for a few days.

I think that will help.

Tramp

Lesson No. 33:

The grudges you keep are carried in a Contra-Asset account, the corresponding Asset is your life; and the latter is a scarce resource.

Both are measured in seconds, hours, and years...not pounds.

Tramp

Rest assured, you played no role.

BT

Allen,

Wow! You've had quite the busy day! Admittedly, I didn't understand most of your three posts, and I'd be pleased to see someone come along and provide a Reader's Digest version, if they're able.

I did see that you find me amusing. For that, since As I mentioned, I find you amusing too, I am quite pleased.

Though, I can't help but wonder how many chapters you'd have filled for someone you didn't find amusing?

BT

BT: Part Three:

"Many of the truths that we cling to depend on our point of view.” Although there is no written rule, you accuse me of being quick to block people. In your eyes, those two years of tolerating jibbering backhanded bubble-spitting trolling, from your closest "friends", before blocking them must have been too soon, in your opinion. There is enough basis to build on, after what seems two very long years, to determine there would be nothing but trolling insults to follow any thing they post(s) and I double dawg dare you to differ (not really, it's a moot point and wouldn't serve you well anyway); just like Ron and Kathy posting after you, it isn't difficult to know Ron is senselessly trolling, based on his past posts towards others. For the record, not that any exists, I don't have multiple accounts and don't have a need for multiple accounts to read it, like your "close "friends" (which I believe 9 blocks for 4 people may not have even covered it!). Also, not with the help of any "force", you never once questioned yourself being the one dodging a block, especially in my view of the company you keep. I am sure there may have been a notion of thought why you are not blocked after so many failed attempts of belligerently correcting and belittling remarks. I will tell you why and it's fairly simple. I find your subtle douche-baggery commentaries amusing, it's just one of a few reasons I've kept you around. You amuse me with the specially casreful approach you take to my posts and I see you struggling to stay focused and stay between the lines. I want you to do what you have been doing all along and keep doing it. It makes you, well, you. You're that special link I could always count on to keep that “bridge tender”; more iron(y) for you, wouldn't want you getting anemia from all this. I know you're a smart fella', right? I have faith in your senses and I’m sure you’ve already figured it out by now, maybe........ maybe not. You’ve done well in most instances, but sadly your purpose is almost served. "mmm. Lost a planet master obi-wan has, how embarrassing...."

“To be Jedi is to face the truth, and choose. Give off light, or darkness, Padawan. Be a candle, or the night.” Carry on padawans........................

BT: BTW, you're standing in front of Ron and Kathy's glass house.

:-)

BT: Part two:

“Reckless he is, matters are worse.” and “Younglings, younglings gather ’round.” It seems as though I do need to make a clarification, not for your sake, but because you are making an accusation. Should I care? No. Should I feel made to defend myself? No. “Urm. Put a shield on my saber I must” I didn’t comment directly on what someone I blocked had to say. I don't have Crazy4us2 blocked. I also took from a poster's quote from another thread as well as the question raised in this one. It is blatantly obvious, at least to myself, with the possibly of others who saw the connection with this so-called "Lesson #30", as you call it. It isn't a hard find nor I would hope so, especially for the participants. It would be a fair assumption as well to indicate you know this and can twist it and turn it all you want; for those having no clue, it is what it is, just two posters differing. If you honestly had no clue, it would be with total disregard to your usual posting patterns. Speaking of "it", it is much like what you recently provided in quotations, yet no one I see is accusing them of replying to direct statements, yet anyone can see "they" are replying to your specific quoted posts based on your replies back, ironic indeed...... Ironic you make the accusation and yet certain "friends" of yours do and are commenting in other threads and posts I make as well. Does it bother me? No and I'll get to that in the next paragraph. I don't believe your accusation be non-hostile. BT, you obviously have a problem with me and you won’t openly admit you're an opportunist, yet all the evidence is there; guess what? That’s all on you. “Named must your fear be before banish it you can.”