Sedition

In a civil suit, taking the 5th can be construed as an admission of guilt...

I have never heard of anyone testifying to no crime before , lol .

“Trump must testify in court...congratulations..lol“

That’s when he gets to say “ I don’t assess my own property and business , THE BANK DOES “

Mueller probe / report , 32 MILLION DOLLAR investigation into a hoax that he knew was a lie just for propaganda !
How does someone spend that kind of money investigating something he knew was a hoax ?

"5th? Horrible...only the mob takes the 5th..if you are innocent why take the 5th"- Donald J. Trump

Breaking News: Trump must testify in court...congratulations..lol

Yawn.

Everything you posted, again, were extrapolations.

And if you are going to cut and paste, you might want to get ALL of it.

From the same article you cut and pasted from:

"Former federal prosecutor Seth Waxman has seen no evidence that these leaks—often sourced to people familiar with the investigation or briefed on it—have come directly from Mueller or his staff."

Again . . .

YAWN.

January 2, 2018: A source detailed the physical characteristics, clothing, race, and gender of grand jury members to the New York Post and alleged that the grand jury room “looks like a Bernie Sanders rally.”
February 17, 2018: CNN cited anonymous sources stating that Gates was close to negotiating a plea deal with Mueller and that new charges against Manafort were being prepared. Less than a week later, Gates entered a guilty plea to conspiracy and lying to the FBI, and a superseding indictment was filed against Manafort.
February 27, 2018: CNN reported that three "people familiar with the matter" said Mueller had recently questioned witnesses about Trump’s business activities in Russia and negotiations surrounding a potential Trump Tower in Moscow.
February 28, 2018: An unnamed former Trump campaign aide told CNN Mueller’s team asked about comments former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks made during her interview with investigators about possible contacts between the campaign and Russian operatives.
March 2, 2018: Witnesses and others familiar with the investigation reportedly told NBC News Mueller’s team was asking questions about Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner’s business ties. The following week, NBC cited sources familiar with the matter saying Qatari officials withheld damaging information about the United Arab Emirates’ influence on Kushner from Mueller.
March 3, 2018: According to the New York Times, Mueller was looking into attempts by the United Arab Emirates to buy political influence on Trump and the role of Lebanese-American businessman George Nader.
March 4, 2018: Axios obtained a copy of a subpoena sent to a former Trump campaign official by Mueller’s team. Sam Nunberg later confirmed he was the source and spoke extensively to the media about the investigation.
March 7, 2018: "People familiar with the matter" told the Washington Post Mueller had evidence from a cooperating witness that a secret meeting in Seychelles between a Trump ally and a Russian official prior to inauguration was an attempt to establish a back channel between the administration and the Kremlin.
March 15, 2018: The New York Times reported that Mueller had subpoenaed documents from the Trump Organization.
April 9, 2018: The New York Times learned federal investigators had raided Trump attorney Michael Cohen’s office and hotel room. Hours later, sources told the Washington Post Cohen was under investigation for possible bank fraud and campaign finance violations.
April 30, 2018: The New York Times obtained a list of questions Mueller wanted to ask Trump. According to the Times, the list was prepared by Trump’s attorneys after speaking to investigators but it was not given to reporters by Trump's legal team.
Former federal prosecutor Seth Waxman has seen no evidence that these leaks—often sourced to people familiar with the investigation or briefed on it—have come directly from Mueller or his staff. When Mueller has spoken publicly, it has been through criminal complaints and indictments.

September 1, 2017: The Washington Post reported Mueller’s investigators had a copy of a draft letter prepared by Trump aide Stephen Miller to justify the firing of Comey in May 2017.
September 20, 2017: Emails reportedly turned over to Mueller’s team and Senate investigators leaked to the Washington Post revealed that Manafort offered to provide private briefings to a Russian billionaire with ties to the Kremlin during the 2016 campaign.
October 4, 2017: Reuters cited three "sources familiar with the investigation" saying that Mueller’s team had taken over the FBI’s inquiries into a dossier of allegations regarding Trump’s Russia ties compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele. Two officials also reportedly told Reuters Mueller was looking into whether Manafort or others helped the Kremlin target hacking efforts and social media posts to influence the election.
October 27, 2017: "Sources briefed on the matter" told CNN that the first charges in Mueller’s investigation had been filed under seal. The following Monday, charges were unsealed Manafort and campaign aide Robert Gates, as well as a guilty plea by former adviser George Papadopoulos.
November 5, 2017: NBC News reported multiple sources said Mueller had enough evidence to bring charges against Flynn and his son. According to NBC, the FBI was also investigating a possible effort by Flynn to extradite a Muslim cleric in the U.S. whom Turkish President Recep Erdogan blamed for a coup attempt.
November 16, 2017: The Wall Street Journal cited a "person familiar with the matter" reporting that Mueller's team had subpoenaed Russia-related documents from Trump's campaign, including documents and emails written by several campaign officials.
December 2, 2017: Multiple "people familiar with the matter" told the Washington Post that former top counterintelligence official Peter Strzok was removed from Mueller’s team because of anti-Trump texts between him and an FBI attorney with whom he was having an affair. Details of many of those texts, which were under investigation by the Department of Justice Inspector General’s Office, have since been leaked to various media outlets.

"Same with Mueller team" hahahaha

June 3, 2017: The Associated Press revealed Mueller’s team had taken over a criminal probe of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
July 22, 2017: Two sources claiming direct knowledge told Reuters Mueller’s investigators were hoping to use evidence of money laundering or other financial crimes to pressure Manafort to cooperate in the collusion probe.
August 3, 2017: Citing "people familiar with the matter," the Wall Street Journal reported a grand jury had been impaneled by Mueller. White House attorney Ty Cobb said at the time he was unaware of the grand jury’s existence.
August 9, 2017: The Washington Post reported FBI agents conducted a predawn raid of Manafort’s Virginia home on July 26 to seize documents and other materials related to Mueller’s investigation. According to the Post, people familiar with the search said a warrant sought financial records and the evidence collected included binders Manafort had prepared for his congressional testimony.
August 24, 2017: "A source close to the investigation" provided Fox News with new details of the raid of Manafort’s house and claimed it was “heavy-handed, designed to intimidate.”
August 25, 2017: "People familiar with the matter" informed the Wall Street Journal that Mueller was investigating Flynn’s involvement in a private effort to obtain Hillary Clinton’s email from Russian hackers.
August 28, 2017: According to NBC News, three sources said Mueller’s investigators were focused on Trump’s role in writing a response to media reports about a meeting between campaign officials and Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016.

@Perfect

"There's been almost zero leaks"

Same with the Mueller team.

There have been a lot of wishful thinking that Durham has a lot of shit (HINT: Kash telling the gullible that Clinton did everything) to Durham ain't got shit (The other side.) I have stated over and over, dig. I have stated that at nearly 500 days into this, all he has is two indictments, one that legal advisors are pretty split on if it has legs or not. Hell, even writers for the National Review claim the Sussmann case is weak as fuck. So from my perspective, let it ride out. Going of what is publicly known, not assumed, it looks weak as fuck.

“ Noody that's not on the Durham team has any clue. There's been almost zero leaks”

Lmfao

When there is nothing to leak. You get zero leaks. If they had anything, anything of substance. It would have been leaked in durning the last election. Trump and his team are to sloppy and undisciplined to not have it leaked.

You still have not laid out Durham’s track record.

"Or are you just being your usual troll self?"

Nope, just mocking you. Noody that's not on the Durham team has any clue. There's been almost zero leaks

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies. The Attorney General shall inform the Special Counsel in writing of the specific reason for their removal.

President Trump – “Justice Is Coming for Hillary”

"I have read a number of analyses of the JFK assasination."

And do you have an opinion on which one is correct?

Or are you just being your usual troll self?

"I have read a number of analyses of Durham's latest filing."

I have read a number of analyses of the JFK assasination.

"Anyone on the Durham team?"

LOLg
Sure. Anyone on the Durham team is going to say they have no case.

I have read a number of analyses of Durham's latest filing.

I've found one, Eric Garland, who thinks there might be something there.

When people say, there is nothing to see here, move on.... my mind says dig deeper.

“ Hey, WTH, I'm being blocked by Fun???”

Lol

You’ll be better for it.

“ This isn't Durham's first rodeo. This guy has a great track record.”

What exactly is his track record?

"The consensus is that he has no case."

That is the most typical Libtard post. A consensus of whom? Anyone on the Durham team? A consensus of talking heads on media that you watch.

“Durham will get shut down soon by Mayorkis “

Durham can’t get shut down unless he does something illegal .

Sard.

You have a serious case of TDS, he is no longer in office and yet he continues to live rent free in your head.

Hey, WTH, I'm being blocked by Fun??? Snowflake anyone?