Roe vs Wade

Nice score.

Sum….. ok. Thanks for the clarification.

Tbr…..”What was your LSAT?”

I took it twice. First time I scored a 151 (41). Second attempt was a 172 (69).

Onehell…”My question stands. Where does it say anything about the baby being innocent.”

Like many other laws. Your argument was addressed in subsequent SCOTUS opinions. You might want to reference US v Higgs.

But thanks for trying.

"No, I enrolled in law school. "

What was your LSAT?

Y'all lost at life if you're making fun of a guy bettering himself like that. Jealous much ?

Remember the kids that took Spanish or French in school?

They would try to speak it away from class, trying to show off what they learned in their first week or month.

Not understanding what they were saying though. Just mispronouncing foreign word salads

“Do you think the woman is pregnant with a kangaroo?”

No a cat.

What is the difference?

My question stands. Where does it say anything about the baby being innocent.

Your showing how much more law school you need to attend.

“The federal law is used to convict the accused. State law dictates the manner in which the sentence is to be carried out (ie: lethal injection, electric chair etc). If the state in which the perpetrator is being held does not uphold the death penalty, the federal court will attempt to remand the perpetrator to a state that adheres to the death penalty”

Reading is fundamental. They didn’t teach you that at Drexel? If the state the prisoner is in does not allow the death penalty? How can they be sentenced to death penalty in that state unless it was on Federal charges?

You’ve lost your first case there council. And I didn’t go to the Thomas Kline School of Law.

Onehell….”What section of 18 3596 mentions anything about a “developing baby”?”

Do you think the woman is pregnant with a kangaroo? Your arguments have not gotten any more lucid in the past year. Well done on staying, at least, consistent. Shame it is consistently wrong.

Onehell…. First off, I attend Drexel University’s Kline School of Law.

You do realize that federal law supersedes state law, right? The federal law is used to convict the accused. State law dictates the manner in which the sentence is to be carried out (ie: lethal injection, electric chair etc). If the state in which the perpetrator is being held does not uphold the death penalty, the federal court will attempt to remand the perpetrator to a state that adheres to the death penalty. Yes, the current state “can” try to block such attempts, but is rarely successful.

“It is illegal because the developing baby is innocent and has not been convicted of a capital offense.”

They teach you that in your online law school?

One thing you failed to mention is that this pertains to people who have been sentenced to death by a Federal court. Not a State court.

What section of 18 3596 mentions anything about a “developing baby”?

When is a baby developed?

Sum….. the other poster is “party” correct. Constitutionally, we are not to have a “standing army” (this includes all other branches except the department of the Navy). However, the constitution permits a “temporary” funded army. Hence the reason congress must reappropriate military funding every couple years.

Tbr…. No, I enrolled in law school. But that was a cute jibe. Lol

8—-“Because only the woman can decide if she wants to carry to full term or not.”

Um, no. Nice try. It is illegal because the developing baby is innocent and has not been convicted of a capital offense. But nice to see you fall in line, like a good sheep.

"I don't have one and damn sure aint getting one. Been doing pretty good without one.
Mickey"

And that surprises no one...

Which one of those dummies are you responding to?

You didn't ask about abortion, you asked about why contraception is a Constitutional right, which was ruled 7-2 in Griswold vs CT. I cited that case plus the opinions of the Justices on why contraception is a right protected by the Constitution. So I directly gave you the answer to your question, and you... have pretty much nothing to say back. At least I'd like to hear your arguments as to why those 7 Justices were wrong.

If you believe that only enumerated rights are constitutionally protected, then the US cannot have an Air Force since the Constitution says that the US can set up the Army and Navy... no mention of an Air Force.

Also, your argument that only enumerated rights are protected is pretty retarded, since in the 10 amendments which make up the original Bill of Rights, Amedment 9 is this:

Amendment IX:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

I guess you never got your GED, but if you just do a little bit of research, you'll find why this Amendment was added:

"The Ninth Amendment was James Madison’s attempt to ensure that the Bill of Rights was not seen as granting to the people of the United States only the specific rights it addressed. "

In other words, it was explicitly added to keep dummies like you from arguing that only enumerated rights are allowed. Of course dummies will argue their dummy arguments, because well, they are dummies.

I don’t know where you have been but ole Joe did last Friday when he was trying to get more money for abortion. …..My goodness …

Who is politicizing it besides you?

Wow , I just listened to Jesse Watters and he had the Indiana AG on and he knew nothing about it . Columbus Dispatch is reporting it but they are also saying OHIO has a law that an underage rape Victim can get an abortion in the state of Ohio . I wonder why IF true they are politicizing this . IF true she could have got the abortion performed no questions asked . This doctor in Indiana has some questions to answer.

Multiple news sources are reporting the arrest... even FOX News.

@Sard , quit telling stories ….They just had the Indiana AG on TV and they have no names dates or records .
Now the hospital is investigating the doctor and she could lose her license . She is on record performing operations on child abuse cases and not reporting …..OH yea the AG said this is against HIPPA. And she could lose her license . But they are investigating , using a tragedy if true for political gain.

The Ohio guy that impregnated the 10yo has been arrested..he admitted.

"I don't have one and damn sure aint getting one."

Proudly uneducated?