Poor little troll still has reading comprehension issues so let me ask once again, for the dunce in the back of the room.
“The fact that you haven’t come up with anything linking this administration with fascism or cultist tendencies means you either lied, misspoke or don’t know what the fuck you are talking about…”
The key words there are THIS ADMINISTRATION. Perhaps you don’t know the meaning of those words?
Keep flailing
lol
~Scamp
@DTH/GV, “I stated that political cults exits in both parties, I then provided the definition for you, and yet that pea brain of yours just doesn’t want to admit it!
I don’t have to give you specifics, they exist , take it or leave it.”
Ok I will agree either way this. And as Window said, I will leave it. But, you do need to provide facts when you accuse two people here as cult leaders and accuse me specifically of being one of their followers.
So yes. You need to provide those facts.
Or as suspected when you won’t provide them. You’re nothing but a troll.
You’re using their catch phrases as if it will lend you some credibility…
It helps to have an understanding of context.
I understand that you’re threatened by Scamp and Tbr.
It is always interesting using the app, so let me clean this up
So let this get through that thick head of yours.
I stated that political cults exits in both parties, I then provided the definition for you, and yet that pea brain of yours just doesn’t want to admit it!
I don’t have to give you specifics, they exist , take it or leave it. Hell there is enough evidence on both sides,
I sure as hell can’t make you understand what you refuse to understand!
You aren't making any sense at all.
Would you like to admit who is left behind?
I get too many offers. It’s a nuisance.
Somehow i doubt that’s a problem we have in common.
Leave it? LOL..... It is a definition your dumbass
Leave it. The only one getting hysterical and losing their mind is GV. Note the use of exclamation marks in her posts.
Your source is 24 years old which makes it irrelevant due to a constantly changing political environment.
2000 was before 9/11 a world pandemic, Brexit, and a host of climate crises.
We hadn’t yet had an increase in fascistic interest among the population.
Our troops hadn’t been deployed to Afghanistan for 20 years. The economy was STABLE.
Yet you cite a dated source, pat yourself on the back and feel clever? How clueless.
So let this get through that thick head of yours.
I stated that political cults exists in both parties, I then provided the definition for you, and yet that Lea brain of yours just doesn’t want to admit it!
I don’t have to give you specifics, they exost , take it or leave it. Hell there is enough evidence on both sides, I sure as hell can’t make you understand what don’t want to refuse to understand!
As extreme a
It’s fun to watch you lose your fucking mind, and how I live rent feee in that pea brain of yours!
Nothing more than a fucking troll.
So..... it's like a month until the change of administration. If Kamala and the DNC actually cared about people of this country. They'd quickly and quietly let Kamala ascend to the oval office & do all the shit she promised on "day 1" if elected.
Instead...... nothing...
He is BACK.. 5 posts all in a row on forums.. he is on fire!
Too bad we cant see what he wrote!
Once again, dth won’t respond when called out and instead moves on to insulting others.
The fact that you haven’t come up with anything linking this administration with fascism or cultist tendencies means you either lied, misspoke or don’t know what the fuck you are talking about so you fling shit around like a pigeon playing chess.
~Scamp
LOL Spoken like another self proclaimed internet genius. Fuck otta here Einstein
Allen Iverson?
That comment reveals she obviously has no clue what AI is.
the more you post without the help of AI, the dumber you look
Stick to AI, it makes you look smarter then you are.
It DTH/Rambo world,
the only person with any permission to use loopholes is the guy who used a military cemetery as a publicity stunt.
Anyone who questions his leader is automatically perceived as a personal attack. That’s a cult member mentality.
This is the person, who tenaciously denied, that Donnie isn’t a rapist. A defense based solely on the way the state of NY languages digital rape vs penile penetration.
That’s the moment I realized that all the false equivalency is a way to excuse everything. That’s a very flexible ethical approach to assault.
Why would someone identify so strongly with a person having a long history of sexual assault? Perhaps they have something in common.
As usual, dth’s reading comprehension failed him.
“… devise a plan that stretches the rules a bit…” falls far short of advocating breaking the law but you only see what you want to see.
And what you don’t want to see. Need I remind you of the J6 insurrection that you defended?
And it’s laughable for you to claim you will hold Drumpf accountable, you defended him when he was found guilty of 34 felonies and when he was found to have sexually assaulted E Jean Carroll. You didn’t just defend him, you gleefully cast your vote for him and proclaimed, “That’s my guy!”
As for your google search to find that cults may possibly exist on the extreme fringes of political parties, that doesn’t answer my question at all. Please share how the current administration qualifies, as I showed you how your dear leader does.
Go lick your wounds and try again. This little rant of yours fell failed, as usual.
~Scamp
She will NEVER criticize her idol.
She never has and even defends his criminality in the face of legally accepted evidence.
It’s a fake image meant to save face while constantly pushing her false equivalencies.
“ One
Reading comprehension escapes you. I feel like I said, when he takes office and does stupid shit, I will call him out on it.”
This is ironic platinum.
“Reading comprehension escapes you. I feel like I said, when he takes office and does stupid shit, I will call him out on it.”
You said you won’t defend him. You never said you will call him out.
“Reading comprehension escapes you. I feel like I said, when he takes office and does stupid shit, I will call him out on it.”
So he has proposed a pretty radical step for American citizens. You’re not going to call him out on it? You have to wait until he is sitting at the Resolute desk?
I don’t understand?
One
Reading comprehension escapes you. I feel like I said, when he takes office and does stupid shit, I will call him out on it.
@DTH/GV, “The difference between you and I, is that I will not defend Trump when he fucks up once in office, unlike your constant defense of Biden throughout his Presidency.”
But you won’t speak against Trump either.
How do you feel about Trumps proposal to deport (if that is what it’s called) American citizens who have family members who are not citizens?
