People stop with that's infections and bed smells and dearth. I m un-cut and have in m life a lot girls (woman's ). No one complain about smell or have infection becouse that. In general people need to be clean. Never mind if you are cut or not.... what that's mean? If i m cut that's mean i don't need to shower anymore?
god made us with a foreskin so he must think its the way to be
An important stat everyone seems to be missing here is the health of the female partner. Wives of circumcised men are much less likely to get infections.
cleanliness is next to godliness
MRS prefers CUT. The un-cut ones she has encountered she said smell and taste dirty.
I am 63 years old and uncut, never had an issue with the ladies regarding the foreskin.
All I know is that when I first enter her and the foreskin stretches back and the head comes out, it is an indescribable feeling of pleasure!
why so much washing? because i want to make sure i am nice and clean. Say, if you and your lady have a swing date with another couple, you shower before you left the house, then all 4 of you went to dinner first, by the time you decided to play, 2-3 hours may have passed. You might have gone to the bathroom a couple of times. So you are not as clean as when you first showered.
smegma also happens to every female.
"Google smegma".
Will there be pictures? I don't wanna see no pictures.
re:why
Google "smegma"
Why so much washing?
i am un-cut, i keep it clean always. Since from first sexually active days, i had many lady went down on me, never any complains on odor. Now days, when we meet others couples for play, i always shower before going and shower again before play, or at least wash down there before play.
A number of the first hand accounts of guys that I read about that had this done as adults mentioned that they noticed they had developed an odor that was persistent. At least one guy mentioned that was the case even when he washed twice a day. Perhaps he had something else going on too, but I can see where it would suck if YOU could smell yourself every day at an age where you're sexually active. So this was even beyond cases of medically needed circumcision or the potential for more infections.
To be honest, I also saw arguments on both sides where it was felt the risk was overplayed to support the need for it. In any event, one thing that is clear is that being uncircumcised is higher maintenance, but whether the means justifies the ends is the debatable question. Considering what this procedure does and where, I'd likely be in support of it not being needed too if I was uncut ;-)
Lol, once again, speak to a urologist about infection rates uncircumcised children are suffering compared to the opposite and get back to me. This is not opinion, it's statistics.
If someone wants to get themselves circumcised as an adult, that's one thing, but parents abusing their sons because of what they think might happen in twenty to fifty years is another thing entirely.
A onsey/twosey/threesey on the pros/cons of not being circumcised is good, but if you consult a urologist and ask what are the commonalities amongst men with UTIs or other infections not common in men or an HIV/AIDS specialist about this, or look at the studies in Africa where much fewer have the procedure, an interesting picture emerges.
Re:to2018
Just for ha-ha's I Googled "why get circumcised as adult" and found first hand accounts of guys that choose to have this done and why. Ironically a number of them WERE for hygiene purposes. YMMV, but probably more than appropriate in this case to say that I have no skin in this game ;-)
You're correct, there is no good reason for circumcision.
Though there may be no good reason/argument for circumcision, I do know that the few times my wife has told someone she won't continue with a BJ unless they went and cleaned up, it was an uncircumcised guy 100% of the time. Perhaps it's just (un)luck of the draw, and you can argue that they just aren't cleaning themselves right/good enough, but she's yet to have that happen with a circumcised guy unless he expected a BJ after pulling a condom off or something. Just saying.
BTW - It's not like the Mrs will refuse someone or even prefer someone cut over uncut, but based on her experience it is headed in that direction. I can see where women with the same sort of experiences would at least prefer someone cut.
cut or uncut doesn't matter to me, as long as they can get hard ;)
Ekserb2 - good comment!
I would never judge someone for what their parents inflicted upon them before they were old enough to decide for themselves, but I will say this: I've never seen a foreskin that had been disfigured because some doctor left it alone, but I have seen plenty of circumcised cocks that were ... well ... less than attractive.
Just reading through to occupy some time, and ran across this, amazed by some of the responses. I was one of those who's parents were so optimistic that they had part of my dick cut off before it was finished growing, but it was pretty commonly accepted that it was for hygiene. Maybe they knew I wouldn't miss the extra flesh but weren't sure that I'd be smart enough to wash under there?
They did accuse me of playing with it so much that it looked like a handle-bar grip on a Huffy tho........
I think same m friends. I m not against religion or against anyone who think different than me. But why big question like cut or un.... i don't see different when i m with woman. All scream same....
There's no good reason to circumcise a man. It's barbaric and driven by mistaken beliefs about hygiene, conformity, or religious nonsense. A penis in its natural state has a foreskin. Why do people think that needs to be corrected?!
I m un-cut.... all m life. And think to keep m skin to the and... i m more glad to cut m finger than cock.... everything is question about hygiene. Everyone (guys) need to be clean shower no meter if u are un or cut... i see soooo many girls with salad in pussy (no bady think about cut or not in that case)...
