Cut v Un-Cut

I'm wondering if an un cut cock wearing negates the foreskin issue totally?

The only issue I have with uncut is cleanliness, which by adult age you would hope a man knows how to keep himself clean.
So if a man is uncut and looks to have good hygiene, no problem

AndrewRobin you make excellent points. I especially like your closing. It's never been an issue with me and I have never had any woman have an issue. I do think that in the last couple of years there has literally been much to do about nothing with what is written and said about it.
As for pleasure, I can say that once the foreskin retracts, I am extremely sensitive. Oral can get so damn sensitive that at times I want to cut it short (pardon the pun) due to the possibility of cumming early. Mrs F doesn't care if it's cut or uncut and that in the end is the only person I consider.

"As always, it falls to me to say the real deal."

.

And away we go... 8^O

Tramp

"Curious, as someone who is uncut what's with all the hate by some towards those who are not."

As always, it falls to me to say the real deal. There's a major world religion, Islam, over a billion people. They are circumcised. There's a small religion, Judaism, only a few million people, they are all circumcised, in some really fucking weird religious rituals that border on child molestation, if you care to investigate for yourself, but they think they're the "chosen ones", and they have a really popular book that backs them up on that claim. The vast majority of Christians in America circumcise their sons according to the dictates of the "chosen ones", but without the weirdness that the more orthodox jews engage in, for some reason the Christians of Europe don't. This is a religion as big as Islam, buddhism, and hinduism, with over a billion people in it. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all spring from the same source. Fucking desert tribes who all decided to cut the tip of their cocks off to give glory to "god" for some fucking reason, and billions of people are affected by it to this day.

It's not the appearance, or the shape, or the feel, of your uncut cock, it goes WAY deeper than that. It offends some people at a primal level, and there's not one damn thing you can do about it, aside from getting circumcised as an adult, which would suck, mightily. There's a reason those religions all do it to their sons when they're very young.

Back to your question, "WHY?" They don't even fucking know why. This is how deep culture goes into the psyche of every individual.

"I'm cut. So, I can't offer you much of a tip."-Bridgetender

""I'm cut. So, I can't offer you much of a tip."

ISWYDT-Fun_Ahoy"

LMAO

Callus? Never happened.

It has been many years since the surgery, sensitivity is not an issue. The only difference now is the added contact time between between erogenous parts.

How long ago were you cut? Was it more than two years ago. I've heard that it takes about two years for the callus to build. If it's been much longer than that and you are seen feeling the pleasurable sensations, then good on you.

I imagine that the immediate difference would make a big impression but over time it would be difficult to remember exactly how it was before surgery. Of course, I am Not speaking from experience.

I have to respond to the comment about uncut being desensitized. For medical reasons, I was circumcised as an adult and after having become sexually active, nothing could be further from the truth in my experience. Sex, and particularly oral, is much more pleasurable for me after I was cut, there's just a lot more friction going on now.

I've never run into a sanitation issue. Circumcision changes the way a cock works. Uncut tends to glide or be used more rhythmically. While the desensitized cut cock can pound. I guess it depends on what a woman wants.

"I'm cut. So, I can't offer you much of a tip."

ISWYDT

I'm cut. So, I can't offer you much of a tip.

Though, I have heard ladies say it's a sanitation issue.

BT

Curious, as someone who is uncut what's with all the hate by some towards those who are not.