Occasionally I verify pics

Thanks for the suggestion, but no I don't think that's the way "we" want to do it. That may work for you, but not everybody.

<p><a href="https://www.swinglifestyle.com/profile/lookup.cfm?usercode=31496404">wkendfun874</a>,</p>

<p> </p>

<p>From your first post, you wanted to post a picture of your boat dashboard to show you were interested in boating. Why not just put that in your profile text? Say something about being interested in boating and you can take a picture of yourself posing next to your boat or in your boat and show that in the public picture area.</p>

Back peddling again and again and again. Get rid of the attorneys that have you skeeered shitless and hire some that will give you proper advice. Its been years longtime members have been begging you to stop the excessive denial of anything to do with sex and get this site back to a decent swingers site. We are smart enough to know when smoke is being blown up our ass. We don't mind regulations when they make sense, but when they are based of some lawyers advice that make no sense what so ever we are going to raise the bullshit flag.

<p><a href="https://www.swinglifestyle.com/profile/lookup.cfm?usercode=62642854">Onehorneywife</a>,</p>

<p>"<span style="background-color:rgb(230, 230, 249); color:rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:tahoma,verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:14px">if the policy is that the pics must be of the owners of the profile, what is to say that the pics being posted are actually the people themselves."</span></p>

<p>We just do the best we can with that. Obviously, we are not always going to be able to tell if it is the real profile owner. When it isn't, those profiles usually get reported to us fairly quickly and we go from there.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.swinglifestyle.com/profile/lookup.cfm?usercode=38773507">lcmim</a>,</p>

<p>The face is not required to be shown in any pictures. The picture needs to show enough of the person that you can tell what you are looking at and the person should be the subject of the picture. </p>

<p>For example, a close-up of a tattoo where you cannot tell what part of the body the tattoo is on or if it is the male-half or female-half of the couple that is being shown. Also, the subject of that picture would be the tattoo and not the person. So I would move such a picture to Personal.</p>

So, Wayne if the policy is that the pics must be of the owners of the profile, what is to say that the pics being posted are actually the people themselves. They could be pics of anyone if there are no faces being shown.

Wayne, Just for clarity.
Public and private photos do not require face pics, do they?
I know they do not require nudity.
Just what portion or parts of a human body is required?

LOL

<p>Public and private pictures must show a person (the owner(s) of the profile). That has nothing to do with lawyers or laws. That is just site policy based on the fact that this is a site for people to meet people based predominantly on how they look.</p>

@onehorny Their lawyers have them so afraid of running a swingers site they can't do anything. They should sell it or just close shop.

They should start with firing their IT people first. Maybe that will fix the problem.

This is the fourth time I am trying to upload a picture of my boat dash. It keeps getting denied (SLS must have to wear diapers their lawyers scare the shit out of them so much) Why do I want a pic of my boat dash? Because some people will recognize it and maybe start a conversation ..."Hey where do you boat at? After all this is a site to meet like minded people. Or should we all start wearing diapers and be afraid of everything? I suggest they fire their lawyers and get better ones.

Crazyfantasies our ability to approve was taken away. Not that we care. Sites poorly mismanaged to say the least. Whoever owns it needs to sell it to someone who will fix it.

For any of you who verify pics, can you explain this to me
A guy with a bathing suit on is considered a G rated pic, but a female with a two piece bathing suit is considered PG rated, which in turn on the mobile app labels the picture “not app safe”
This is a lifestyle website and we are concerned about PG rated pictures. I had a pic that only one of each of our legs in it, showing tattoos, but was labeled “not app safe” ridiculous

That's bad but i've been seeing a number of pics lately which show young children. Who in their right mind??

sexyfuncouple4u69... You are right, I should have choose something different. But, I was so shocked at the pick that I was just confused. It's just mind boggling that someone would post a pic like that.

Boom... there it is. Thanks Wayne!

<p><a href="https://staging.swinglifestyle.com/profile/lookup.cfm?usercode=64130517">HartwellHeat</a>,</p>

<p>Those options are in your 'Welcome' section on your homepage, which you currently have turned off. You can go to "Tools" and "Manage Homepage" to turn on the "Weclome" section and then you should see the approval options for pictures and profiles.</p>

I haven't seen a pic verify option in a great while... is that open to all Unlimited members?

What is the profile name? I need a new TV!

Are you serious??? Why would you approve something like that? That should have been reported immediately.

<p>"Explicit" would mean that you think it should be approved as a Personal picture. You should use the "Bad Photo" button for anything that you think should not be posted.</p>

This one is stupid. I was doing my pic verify thing today and a pic showed up of a guy holding a credit card which showed his credit card, the account number and the 3 digit security code. I didn't know how to rate it. So I picked Explicit. Was this the right rating. Are people really that stupid to show that kind of personal data? What is happening out there.