@2out
NO. One of the problems is the hypocrisy. Another of the problems is the FUD. And a main problem is ignorance of how the system really works.
I pointed out the hypocrisy. Again, the NUMBER of 'illegal' crossings was HIGHER under Bush, Jr. than they are TODAY. Want me to fuck with your head? It was ALMOST as high under Reagan. I mean under Reagan it was 99.5% of what it is today. So this is a problem that for FORTY THREE years has existed. Today it is an issue? WHY? Why today instead of then?
I pointed out the FUD. @Marion was talking about the costs. @Funly thought he'd be cute and throw a jab. The data doesn't fucking back up the bullshit rhetoric. There was a 100% employment level for over adults in my county for these 'illegals.' They are PUMPING money into the US economy. FOUR percent of them are at or below the poverty line. Want to pull the data on YOUR county? Want to bet that the white trash fuckers in the single wide are on welfare and the immigrants aren't? For those that scream put in a hard honest day's work, well, fuck . . . have you looked at the white AMERICANS in this situation?
You and the ignorant people on the situation have no clue how the immigration system works. You want to sit behind your keyboard and scream, "OH NOES, an IMMIGRANT is going to rape my daughter while getting free health care." Learn how our immigration system works. It is an UTTER SHITSHOW. You have fucking republicans who will NOT fund judges. An asylum case can take up to SEVEN years to get through the system because of the backlog. Every time someone says, "Hey, hire more judges." The Republicans scream, "That is making GOVERNMENT BIGGER! FUCK THAT," all the while they were happy as fuck to fund TSA.
My wife, who knows little about this shit, well, we talked a little during a 200 mile drive. She never knew why people crossed 'illegally' instead of through the port of entry. I said it was simple, they wanted to guarantee an outcome. If you put forth any effort and read about metering, you'd understand that.