RUSSIAN COLLUSION

TBR..... Really? Is that what he said? You twist things enough to work for CNN. Lmfao

LOL...

Trump just took the Steele Dossier off the table by saying colluding with a foreign power for dirt on your opponent is no big deal and he would do it.

There goes Fred's reason for living...

DNLB ha ha ha ha ha....no...

The National Popular Vote scheme is unconstitutional, it's a silly idea.

Someonescoming polls are like hammer...it does the job all the time..it will get your finger from time to time or someone can use it to kill someone else but the purpose and function remain...get the nail in

well..2 things happen..states passed legislations against electoral college and passed legislation that you must show your taxes to be put on the ballot. Trumpisim will fade into the past very fast. as of now: 14 states and the District of Columbia — pledged their electoral votes to whichever candidate wins the most ballots from all 50 states. In effect, it hands the 2020 presidential election to whoever wins the nationwide popular vote. (check the Natinal popular vote)
www nationalpopularvote com/sites/default/files/one-pager_0.pdf

also: bills have been introduced in 17 states that would keep President Trump off their election ballots in 2020 unless he releases his tax returns to the public.

The social science major is a data analyst for the largest higher education system in the country.

The electrical engineer makes trophies...

LMFAO. Yup, I don't know anything about math. My professors all pushed me through because of the no child left behind rules.

The Arts major is a math wizard. He secretly has developed equations that prove dark matter.

That is because you don't understand it.

But you probably wouldn't like it anyway. It's all about hard stuff like math.

Trumpsters don't like math...

That should be very comforting to her. I don't put much stock in any polling.

Well, if you look at the polls and understand what they were measuring, they were accurate.

The polls were measuring vote share. Clinton won that by the 3% the polls predicted.

TBR.... Bringing up the results from the most recent presidential election is not partisanship. It's just looking at history.

LOL

How very independent of you...

You guys only like polls when they confirm your bias.

Polls are based on probabilities.

How many times can you bet against the house and win?

Lol.....and all the polls showed Hillary winning in 2016. How did that work out again? Lmfao

LOL

Latest polls show the top 6 Dems beating Trump. Handily.

The 2 front runnners are Biden and Sanders. The Dems don't have a chance if one of these 2 are the candidates. The Democratic party is a joke. Maybe if they didn't rig their primary they could get a decent candidate.

LOCK HIM UP , LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP...

LMAO, so much for being different huh?. That's why the poor will remain poor. The rich will get richer. The faux climate doomsday clock will continue to tick. The mathematical equation for Pay your Fair Share will remain a mystery. Dark money will remain a fable. BUT, the Government will get bigger.

I keep saying it.........................Shirts and Skins, Shirts and Skins. The only difference? Who's turn it is to grind the ax.

Its going to be slow continuous bleeding going forever until the Nation is sick of it. .. Remember her emails... Benghazi..

Nah...

He took just enough time to hide the bad stuff.

And not a minute more...

Wow - Then the show trials should end and we move immediately to Articles of Impeachment. LOL bet they won’t........got to keep feeding the low information voters with soon, almost, right around the corner, just one more document, be patient.

Barr caved in ...sending Mueller files and documents to the House intelligence committee...lol..

Only in California can you have two houses right next to each other with identical floor plans but one owner pays $500 in property taxes while the other pays $5,000.

Not true. Due to Proposal A the same thing happens in Michigan. Brilliant lawmakers in all parts of the country.

I doubt the respondent actually has children in the educational system.