Interesting, we were just talking about being honest in another thread here in Men Talk. You should probably check that out.
~Scamp
Interesting, we were just talking about being honest in another thread here in Men Talk. You should probably check that out.
~Scamp
I don't think anyone is complaining about the fact that someone may be heavier or shorter or balder than what they say they are. It's not the numbers that are important. It's the fact that people are either dishonest or self-conscious about their own appearance that is a turn-off. I can understand if you feel uncomfortable about being twenty pounds overweight, but instead of lying about it, do something about it. Or be honest. Either is better than making up facts that can be (and will be) easily debunked in person.
I've said this before: I once saw a woman on the nude beach in Miami who was easily over 275, but she walked with confidence and an attitude that was just so incredibly sexy that I'm sure every man (and probably a lot of the women) on that beach wanted to fuck her. Honesty and conviction is much more erotic than misrepresentation and a lack of self-confidence.
Rabbit.....true, it's far from charming. My eyes didn't roll, but my tummy did. ??
Asto- why have a body pic? Because you can fill out the height/weight/age part of the profile and say anything you want. If you have a current body pic, even if clothed and no face I can at least get an idea if I’m attracted. I have never and will never be attracted to gumbies
BiBlk- “that putrid smell radiating from between her spread thighs ”
Charming. <<eye roll>>
~rabbit~
I rarely care about looks, but I do care about hygiene.....so yes, let's talk about that putrid smell radiating from between her spread thighs that I refuse to believe she doesn't know about yet here she is with her husband going down on her while I'm standing 10 feet away trying my best not to gag and while actively searching my mind for the excuse to cut and run right fucking now.
personally I don't post a photo, but I do have one in my gallery and also a video face to face. Reasons not to show are kind a personal. but those who choose too, rarely show their face. Just a mid body pic, pair of feet , or legs so, what's the point. You'll find out soon enough whos real and who isn't. Lot of Bull Shitters for sure.
Erotic sorry but i weight less then when i was 18. In high school i was playing ball at 172lbs and first year in college i tried to make the team taking roids at 195.
Right now i am pretty ripped at 157. I just got measured for a wedding and i have a 42 inch chest with a 31 inch waist. My wife is 117lbs this morning and is around the same weight she was at 18. Not quite as much muscle but she was dancing in the ballet until she pulled her back muscle at 45. College and amateur never pro.
At the Las Vegas athletic club where we work out there are women in the 60's that are ripped, ex showgirls and performers or trophy wives.
As swingers we learned a long time ago that people want to get naked with us if our bodies are in really good shape. My wife loves to turn mens heads and flirt. This brings her so much pleasure that she will never lose her body. We are spending the labor day holiday naked at Freedom Acres. Gotta have a body if you want none stop fun there.
DNL
As I mentioned. That was her playing weight when she was 18! I can not think of any woman who is 48, had two kids who is the same weight they were when they were 18. And to put it in even more perspective . . . she is not physically the same size.
So as I mentioned, it may not be 100% accurate, but by no means is she what her 18 year old weight is. Hell, I think even nutjob would agree to this. I am not the same weight I was when I was 18, technically, I weigh less. But that had to do with being in the gym all the time and bulking up to play center/nose tackle. Considering she played volleyball, she didn't gain weight to play :)
But as MOT would say, as long as she looks HWP the weight is not relevant. Paraphrasing of course.
LOL that just happened to us last weekend. Vietnam but age 60.
eroticamazon - And yet you quickly determined her weight to be upwards of 35 lbs of what she said it is?
I agree, guessing women's weight is not a challenge I want to get into, or take too seriously. I imagine most people tend to estimate their weight towards what they want over what a scale would show, but I'm of the notion that weight & age ought to be somewhere in the neighborhood of reality, other people think that the same zipcode is just fine. I like the tagline "if you don't look like your pictures you're buying the drinks until you do", but in actuality, if you're supposed to be 50 and you start reliving your service in Vietnam, I won't be sticking around for a second drink.
Yet your profile says your wife is 159lbs. So what is it 159 or 210? 60lbs of fat shows on a woman even if she is 6'1"
DNLB
I hate to be that guy . . . but she is just saying shit for the magazine. She also stated she is the same height as her husband. If you look at the Vanity Fair article
(2016) where she talks about her daughter, she gave real numbers for her daughter: 5'11" and 162. Then look at the picture. She is bigger than her daughter. Not eight pounds bigger. She is also taller than her husband :) If you read the people article she states her playing weight as well, it was 168.
The reality is that until either one of us get her recent medical records where they weighed her or put her on a scale, we are not 100% sure. I am just biased because of (a) having a tall wife 6'1.5", (b) having a tall daughter 6', (c) dated lots of tall women in my life (by tall I mean 6' and up (d) have lots of tall women friends (that comes with the territory of being married to a tall woman)
But at the end of the day - it goes back to the conversation with MOT. Guessing weight is very hard, especially when you get to taller people. Shorter people it's easier.
eroticamazon - In January 16, 2018 in bodybuilding dot com she said she weighed 170- celebrityinside agrees-
"Having said that, if you can get your body dialed in when you're tall there are also advantages to that, like weight distribution. I weigh 170 lbs and if I gain weight for any reason on any given week, I really can't tell. I have had knee problems from jumping, and again being taller, there can be more pressure on the joints. But being in sports it's a great gift."
Erotic that is like my wife saying she is not 117 anymore like she was at 18. She is now 135 but that is because of three babies and running a business so its ok and still sexy, and she is 52 years old.
Doesn't work if you really love to be a babe and sexy goddess. My wife does the very simple math. If she is not turning men's heads she is to fat. If at a swing party or club if men are not getting erections with the thoughts of sex with her she is to fat.
Her idea weight for being a sex goddess and making men drool is 117. She k knows that and tries to stay there all summer long. Even at 52 with the help of hair dye she turns the heads of men half her age. During the winter when she is wearing more clothing she can get up to around 125 before she stops turning heads.
DNLB
That was her playing weight at 18. She is 48 now. Her body is bigger. She had two kids. So it may not exactly be in the low 200s, but it is not 170 anymore :)
Considering my wife is almost 6'2, our daughter is almost 6', and we know a lot of very tall women, my weight guess is pretty accurate. We have one friend, she is 6'4" and 235. She will state that she can stand to lose 15 to 20 lbs. We also have a friend who is almost 6' and competes in body building competitions. She is not on the juice, aka, her clit is not a dick, and she is 225. Honestly, she thinks she should weigh less and blames it on being black and having, what she calls, "my big black ass." She is friggin funny about that.
To be honest, it's almost a moot point as far as I'm concerned, though I understand how aggravating it all is to the people who are trying to arrange activities based on these online profiles.
However, the majority of the profiles I see have some version of the same cliches for a narrative, and the photos aren't reasonable enough to give much of any true idea of what the parties look like...even if they were taken yesterday.
I saw a SF profile two days ago that had two close up pictures of the woman's foot. Seriously.
This is why Lady and I both stopped using online profiles a long time ago when we wanted to meet new people. We'd go to clubs or resorts instead. Far better experience for us.
We don't change our weights very often. My weight fluctuates 20 lbs. because of a medical condition, so I put it in the middle. Mrs TBR has lost about 40 lbs in the last year, but I don't even remember what we have her down as.
But our pictures (save 1 or 2) are all taken within the last six months, so you can get a pretty good idea of what we look like.
My irritation is the people that created a profile in 2005, loaded photos & specs and haven't changed a thing since. Age hasn't treated all of us equally well, and for some people 10-12 years and more than a couple of pounds can make it difficult to pick you out at a meet & greet.
I'm not following? Where do you see that Gabby Reece weighs 205-210? She's pretty well on the lean side of HWP at 6'3" & 170, but has some pretty firm muscle in my book.
"But look at her now. 6'3" and 205-210. Is that still HWP in your book?"
My wife is at her summer weight 117lbs and looks great. She is a lucky woman. She put on all her weight in her gut. If she puts on twenty pounds other women ask her when the baby is due. LOLOL She will never get fat. lol Winter weight is around 125.
But look at her now. 6'3" and 205-210. Is that still HWP in your book?
:)
@MOT
You can look up Gabrielle Reece and find LOTS of pictures of her, dressed near nude.
She is actually taller than my wife, she is 6'3". She was a professional volleyball player. When she was in her 20s I think he playing weight was 175. Now, I think she is close to 50, still looks great and I think she is 200ish.
But yeah . . . we agree, the numbers don't mean shit, it is a visual thing.
@MOT
I still disagree that you can nail people's weight and height at a savant level. You may be within a range but I still think you will be off on the measurement.
What does Gabrielle Reece weigh? :)
My ex-wife had an interesting ability to 'hide' weight. She always weighed about 20lbs more than people thought. Going to the doctors . . . the scale where they slide the bar to get the weight, they would always look at her and go huh? She was 5'4. In her thinnest days she was 125. In her heaviest days she was 150.
I also thought the same about a woman we used to meet up with. She claimed to be 105lbs. She was 5 foot flat and had GIANT tits. One day, I mentioned, ok, you aren't 105lbs, you are closer to 130. She said, no, she is probably 108 at the moment. I didn't believe her. We went into my bathroom and she got on the scale . . . boom 107. I just looked at her and she said, no one ever believes her, probably because of her tits.
This is why I am more apt to go off of visual cues instead of measurables. If the person looks like they are proportionate in my eyes, that's fine :) No need for a scale or a tape measure !
"Everyone lies today its the after effect of the Clintons and what they did to America."
"Everyone" would include you, so you must be a liar as well.
It's true! Before Clinton, no one lied. NOT. A. ONE! ...Not Kennedy. Not LBJ. Not Nix... Oh... Never mind...
NutCal... #DumbFuk
BT