The "private" album is viewable on the app. Due to Apple and Android restrictions explicit photos cannot be viewed through the app. So explicit photos are only viewable in your "personal" album through the website.
Unfortunately the app runs the show now, because most new accounts are signed up through the app and will never use the website. I guess it's just too difficult for people to use the web browser on their phone to view an "adult" oriented site.
Shouldn’t really matter if in private or personal.. both are access granted folders anyways. Just more BS to slow site down.
I haven't seen the profile type mismatch. Idk if guys think they will get more hits having a "female" profile, or if many are just too dumb to pay attention to what they are clicking on. That's not as prevalent here as some other sites, but it still happens.
i do approve pics. I try very hard to follow the rules the site posts. Sometimes i'm not sure so i choose that option - let someone else make the call.
Off topic though, i have seem multiple pictures of kids and babies coming through lately. WHY would someone post a picture of a child to this site???
<p><a href="https://www.swinglifestyle.com/profile/lookup.cfm?usercode=49140643">sexyfuncouple4u69</a>,</p>
<p>The pictures were not denied. They were moved to your personal pictures area. It looks like there were 5 of them. Three of them were close-ups of the genitals and two were spread out legs showing the genitals. </p>
<p>You can go to "Tools" and "Manage Pictures" and select the "Personal" tab to see all of your personal pictures.</p>
@italian. I do not how site works internally. Logic tells me that each pic gets rated by more than one unlimited member. If all raters agree with same rating then the pic passes wo the sls gods review. If the same pic is rated differently then it goes to review and the bad grader gets a lower score. I take your point that if sls rates all pic regardless. Why bother. Cheers
“The issue is that the unlimited members rate the pics and each rater has a different level of what is explicit.”
Not true, we thought we were pretty consistent in rating, but our pic approving was taken away from us for “Lack of accuracy” per the powers that be on the site. So the question is why bother even having members approve or deny pics if they are obviously circumventing or secondarily reviewing them anyway to make a determination on what constitutes explicit on any given day.?
If we have to give someone access private or personal it shouldn’t matter!!!
According to sites. These should be rating guidelines.
Use "CHILD SAFE" button for:Any 'G' rated pictures of peopleUse "NOT CHILD SAFE" button for:NudityExcessive kissingExcessive cleavageSuggestive poses (spread eagle, straddling an object, fetish, etc.)Closeups and/or "cropped" photos of the non-nude torsoUse "NO PERSON" button for:Any picture not showing a personA crowd of people (no specific person or couple shown)Use "EXPLICIT" button for:Grabbing and/or touching the genitals by either self or someone elseAny sexual act shown including oral (clothed or nude)Closeups and/or "cropped" photos of nude genitalsAn erection shown for a maleUse "BAD PHOTO" button for:Sideways or upside down picturesANY children being shownAnything illegalWeb addresses shownPictures that are advertisementsNo "Skat play" (fecal play) can be shownScreenshots (pictures of a captured device screen)Use "I AM UNSURE" button for:If you are not sure, use to skip the picture and not rate itUse "PROFILE TYPE MISMATCH" button for:Picture type does not match profile type.EXAMPLE 1: Male profile with female picture.EXAMPLE 2: Female profile with male picture
I agree. No consistency as to what is explicit, but the sites does make it clear that explicit (whatever that means on any given day) can only be posted in personal. Not private.
The issue is that the unlimited members rate the pics and each rater has a different level of what is explicit. All of this is relatively new. Since the law changed that made websites potentially liable for sex traffic. The issue is that the system has not enforced past pics and that is why some older post are explicit in public. My guess. This is their attemp to comply with law in good faith.
Love how this site denies our photos being uploaded to a private gallery because they are too explicit. Funny we see completely nude photos all over public pages. What a joke. I also think reviewers should be an ole to rotate photos or the particular user should be able to. This sites ridiculous. It’s a damn sex site. Not kindergarten.
