RUSSIAN COLLUSION

@sar why would a prosecutor let his star and only witness get on national tv and answer questions. That be like ojs lawyers letting him do the talk show circuit before he ever went on trial. Come on man. Think

"comey thought it didn't reach the threshold for obstruction." - nope ..he said its up to the investigation to decide..Mueller that is..nice try. Comey is a witness. Also Sessions will be testifying as well on 13th...the racist leprechaun will go down hard.

sard, you poor thing. Can't get over losing. Your posts hows you are a Limousine Liberal from NYC.

"No it wasn't. The 2005 tax return was leaked by trump himself. It was not a certified copy."

Not my words yours.

"If they can't verify it than how can you verify it's not real and he leaked it?"

OK pretzel boy...

@sar- I get it. It's not surprising you don't. Comey already told them what was said and comey thought it didn't reach the threshold for obstruction. Keep hope alive though.

If they can't verify it than how can you verify it's not real and he leaked it?

"You mean they didn't verify if it was true or not? they just ran the story?"

They can't verify that leak was Trumps actual tax return because he refuses to release them.

I was likely as not that the return was faked. Easy to put bogus numbers in a tax return and pass it off as the real deal. That's why you have to verify your income against your tax return when you apply for federal financial aid.

ha..not on topic..so you do get it after all...

@sar- your setting yourself up for another disappointment. Though you should be use to it by now with as many times as you have said they had him. Your wasting time and brain cells.

Nixon: did not have "the tapes" either...

I dont think you get it: There is witness who testify about those conversation and what took place. To prove him wrong Trump has to produce tapes that say the opposite. Otherwise he is abusing power by asking Comey to drop investigation into Flynn (who is Russian spy).

@sar- slow down a breath? I know you excited. But once again you gonna be disappointed.

1. He said " he better hope there are no tapes"

1. Even if he said there are tapes and there is none that is not abuse of power.

Look at yourself. You are placing your hopes of an impeachment on if the president said there was some recordings. Lol

2020 MAGA

That's because Dems have no message, no candidate because they are busy chasing ghost and goblins.

" the tax return was leaked by trump".

Yes now it is proven Sar is tbr's long lost son. Them and only them have the proof.

You mean they didn't verify if it was true or not? they just ran the story?

So you don't buy that story? But you buy all the other bs stories they say as fact.

Lol.

"It is not illegal for someone to run ads, as long as they are truth."

No. It is not against the law to run completely untruthful ads.

"he hadn't paid taxes in 20 years and got debunked. "

No, it wasn't. The 2005 tax return was leaked by Trump himself. It was not a certified copy.

sard, Yes, Trump will go down on his beautiful wife, NOT $2.00 HOOKERS FROM HARLEM, like you do.

Now this is how Trump will go down:

1. Investigation will subpoena the Trump tapes from all conversations with Comey.

1. If he can not produce them will go down for Abuse of power like Nixon.

It is not illegal for someone to run ads, as long as they are truth. Doesn't matter if it is Jim across the street, the DNC or NK. What is illegal is libel,slander, false advertising. Who is guilty of what?

What Comey said about his conversations with Loretta Lnych is going to put Clinton and the rest of the Democratic Criminal cartel in JAIL

Lol. keep wishing and hoping. I'm sure you got that same scoop from the same place that said he hadn't paid taxes in 20 years and got debunked. The same place that said comment never told him he was not under investigation. Lol

evidence you will not see..you will see indictment...Trump is actually under 3 separate investigations: 1. Collusion with Russia, 2. Abuse of power and cover up and 3. RICO investigation.

Your right. But still waiting on the evidence. The special prosecutor said the other day he should have this wrapped up in 3 months. So either he's the fastest prosecutor ever of a supposed crime of this magnitude or he has seen the real evidence and sees this crying wolf for what it is.

Funny, there are plenty of cases of Republican candidates in the last election colluding to try and stop Trump. Just because they were not successful doesn't mean they didn't collude. But you never hear anything about that, because it is a nothingburger.

Same with the dems. The DNC had a preferred candidate, and they worked the system to try to advantage their candidate. The National Committees do that all the time. At all levels.

It is quite a different thing to have a foreign government try to do the same thing. That is illegal.

Ok so we know Russia tries to sway the election with certain info that may or maybe not true. Probably used same tatics we use against other countries in their elections. I wish the clowns that preach that had the same distan for the people in this country that print totally fabricated articles. So it's not good for another country to spread bad truths about their candidate , but it's fine for people in this country to spread lies in articles about the candidate they dislike. It's fine for the dnc to collude with one candidate in their primary and not the other. So I guess collusion is good unless it's not your candidate.

The funny thing is so far no evidence of collusion with trump and Russia. Though there is plenty of evidence even admitting collusion in the democrates primary.