@mahem: I've already recanted my calling you not nice things, based on your admitting you meant no insult.
Your obviously fixated on me admitting I made a mistake, and if you sincerely made a spelling error (,3 times in a row) then I admit I assumed incorrectly.
But, if I used the word gay , 3 times to describe you.... You could safely assume I didn't mean I was calling you happy.
And this is where this revamp started. I didn't attack you in any way. You brought up the alleged mistake in your grammar, not me.
"You don't owe this clown any further explanation."
Says the ass clown hiding behind a block that he conveniently uses at his discretion to read my post & reply after re blocking me.
Piss ant
VA - As usual, you are correct. I thought we were done with it too till he accused me of doing the same thing that he just got caught doing. At one point I thought that he at least conceded he made a mistake, but I can see now that I'm not the only one noting it appears he's convinced himself I was lying. Honestly, I'm not that clever at wordplay ;-)
BTW, it was you that pointed out why he even attacked me, so thank you for that. I initially had no clue as to what set him off.
You don't owe this clown any further explanation.
You said it was a typo. He doesn't believe you. How many more days are you going to waste convincing someone who posts relentless trash on here that your typo isn't just shy of an act of domestic terrorism?
Unrelated to the topic, though I was never in the service (Vietnam war ended just before I turned 18, otherwise I'd likely have been drafted), my 3 daughters joined and my youngest is still active as an Army doctor, and I am proud of all 3 of them. To be clear, I have no disrespect towards the military.
What does "it looked right" have to do with the fact that the SLS spell check functionality was removed? The context of this thread was about making incorrect assumptions. Your "mistake" was in assuming my post had bad intent and attacking me for it rather than just asking me if my post meant what you assumed it did.
FWIW - You can check the Website > Generic Forum Questions or Comments forum topic to verify the spell check functionality was recently removed.
Add an e at the end and it’s a group of entertainers such as dancers, acrobats and actors, however that wasn’t the issue.
Troupe. The current administration could certainly be considered a troupe.
All you have to do is watch the fat clown doing the YMCA dance and you know that there’s a possibility that they could be called a troupe.
Being prior service, and my prior MOS being an MP, I understand the the UCMJ and article 92 very well.
If the missile strikes by DJT are illegal, then so were the drone strikes by BHO. Both were against designed enemies of the state, verified through the CIA.
If the order is properly given (even is questionably legal) and followed, the enlisted or commissioned persons passing along or following that order, aren't culpable to prosecution, unless the order is obviously illegal because it violates an article of the UCMJ.
Any negative comments about our troops, regardless of "spelling errors" will be met with immediate hostility.
"Our military has taken a lot of shit in the last 6 months over the narco terrorists getting popped in the ocean."
The question about determining whether or not an order is a legal order has been a topic of heated discussion. Some people get more heated than others.
I did let it go in the first post. In the second consecutive post he spelled it "incorrectly" two more times. That's the post I originally replied to.
My "assumption" was he was referring to the military as paid actors carrying out a script, written by DJT , instead of doing their jobs.
Agreed, I read into it entirely to deep, but I'm touchy about certain shit. Our military has taken a lot of shit in the last 6 months over the narco terrorists getting popped in the ocean.
I know. Personally I would have recognized that "troup" was a misspelling/typo and read it as "troop" because of the context and particularly because he has no prior history of intentional or inflammatory name calling or implications- that I'm aware of.
YMMV
He stated he didn't have the advantage of autocorrect.
"Your "response" is that you were using a keyboard and did not have the advantage of spell check. Troop vs troup... O&U aren't right beside each other on a keyboard & you typed it that way 2 or three times I believe..."
I have no dog in this fight but "Troup" is a proper name and would most likely show as spelled incorrectly if the software recognizes that it didn't begin with an upper case "T". After a misspelling (or 2 or 3?) my software recognizes my repeated use of a word without correcting the spelling and no longer indicates it as misspelled and, in fact, will autofill/complete a word with "my" spelling if I've used it before.
I can't tell you how many times I've been told "swinglifqstyle dot com" can't be reached. Ducking autocorrect auto completes this site to the incorrect spelling when I attempt to log on with one of my computers because I had fat fingers once.
From mayhem" I literally thought "troup" looked correct to me at the time. That's why it was consistently spelled incorrectly, but thank you for making my point for me by assuming while accusing me of doing the same."
So.... When I "mistakenly" called you out on it, your original response was that you didn't have spell check, but NOW it was just a spelling error that "looked right" ?
Okie dokie...
I literally thought "troup" looked correct to me at the time. That's why it was consistently spelled incorrectly, but thank you for making my point for me by assuming while accusing me of doing the same.
It's part of a general attitude towards not taking responsibility for things they say.
They want to be able to post whatever works for them right now without it conflicting with anything else someone might point at.
"IIf I'm asking you questions, how is that assuming anything? Assuming is when you see a spelling mistake, read the worst possible intent into it and call someone a pathetic POS based on that without asking if it was intentional"
I'm still not convinced you made a spelling error. Your "response" is that you were using a keyboard and did not have the advantage of spell check. Troop vs troup... O&U aren't right beside each other on a keyboard & you typed it that way 2 or three times I believe... So, I phrased my response to your "explanation" the way I did.. if* it was an accident (3 times) then I recant my statement.
It’s certainly a sort of self immolation.
"If I recall, R&K go back and delete all of their forum posts. Not sure if they still do that because I'm part of that company."
I don't know about R&K doing that but I recall Someonescoming deleting most of their posts. They should have thousands upon thousands of posts but I don't recall their post count ever exceeding 300.
Just prior to SC's blocking me the 1st time he had deleted all of his posts of the discussion I had been having with him. I'm guessing I had looked just prior to his blocking me because I could still read his posts that he hadn't deleted. Perhaps a good reason to C&P posts you're responding.
Does deleting posts count as burning it down?
If I recall, R&K go back and delete all of their forum posts. Not sure if they still do that because I'm part of that company.
If I'm asking you questions, how is that assuming anything? Assuming is when you see a spelling mistake, read the worst possible intent into it and call someone a pathetic POS based on that without asking if it was intentional.
There are other examples, so you may want to keep that in mind when you say things like, "...you and your cohorts assumed a whole bunch...."
You’re also not a whiny, fragile, baby. They’re not at all difficult to identify. They’re also unfuckable.
I actually did have an instance of "reverse racism" directed at me.
I was working for the Head Start program in the early 2000s. A team of us went to another grantee to help them out.
I had a Hispanic guy from the grantee berate me for taking a job away from a minority.
I probably could have gotten him in a bunch of trouble, but I figured that was less of a penalty than the hate he had to live with.
I love when people are so warped that they believe they are persecuted for being intolerant.
It’s the epitome of self delusion to believe that one is a victim because they’re a revolting fuckwit expecting others to accept their nauseating white superiority.
You aren’t owed acceptance. That’s ludicrous. Spewing bigotry deserves rejection.
They only do it on here because they know that they would get knocked on their asses if they did this in person.
Poor little cowards. Everyone is mean to them. Boo hoo.
