My question was in regards to your statement that government health care is less efficient.
"The most/best for the least cost/effort is a general take on efficiency.
One caveat. Humans generally want things when they want things, especially when they have a real or imagined health issue. There are not enough doctors or hospitals to treat everyone for everything they want right now.
Medicare has a very low administrative cost, in the neighborhood of 2%. The problem there is the population. Old people get sick, and something like 80% of medical expenses are in the last year/couple of years of life.
The VA has very high customer satisfaction. Around 92% of VA patients have trust in the VA health care. 79% of customer surveys give the VA a 4 or 5 star rating.
Canada has some problems, sure. But everyone is covered. About half of Canadians are satisfied with their health care coverage, a little bit higher than the US, but Canada spends half per patient.
It is well documented that the US spends twice what other countries spend as a percent of GDP.
There are models in this country that work. My health insurance is an example. I have the lowest cost health insurance available by my employer, Kaiser. Granted, I work for the state, and my employer is very generous with the coverage. It costs them about $2,600 a month to cover my family.
But for that, I have no premium, no deductible, no copays. Generally, the only thing I pay for is copays for medication, which are ridiculously low. I take Ozempic for diabetes, and pay $10 a month for a $1,200 pen. So they are not making very much money off of me. ;-)
The other side of the story is that Kaiser has a 4% administrative cost, and a service denial rate of 6% in 2023, compared to an average 12% average admin cost and a 32% denial rate for United Health Care.
So your assertion that government run health care is false by your metric. And there are ways to improve health care here.
The bottom line is that if you want to do it, it is possible. All we lack is the will.