Sedition

Over 550,000 Registered Voters In Wisconsin Have a Registration Date of 1/1/1918 – 115,252 of Them Voted.

Nothing to be concerned about ?

From what I read that document was never issued .

If you do not yet believe the former President was planning a coup, you owe it to yourself to read this piece and the document contained therein:

w*w.politico. com/news/2022/01/21/read-the-never-issued-trump-order-that-would-have-seized-voting-machines-527572

Make no mistake, the former President was prepared to violate the oath of office to interrupt the orderly transfer of power. The former President was prepared to trash the Constitution to consolidate his power.

He will try again.

I wonder what the floor looks like next to the wall at SAR’s place ?

Sar

You posted bs about the National Guard, when there is documented proof to the contrary and then your latest, let’s sling some crap against the wall and see if it sticks is a joke

Show your proof for your last post on this thread

The GOPers that submit the fraudulent electoral votes must be shitting their pants now...

Donald Trump considered seizing voting machines across the country after he lost the 2020 election, using debunked conspiracy theories as a pretext.
Following the seizure, to be overseen by the secretary of defense, Trump would have then appointed a special counsel to pursue “all criminal and civil proceedings as appropriate,” - lol

SAR , your bomb is a big DUD , Trump offered National Guard before Jan . 6 , And that is Documented !
The propaganda news and sham j6 committee won’t tell you that .

That's a "bomb" for sure

Meanwhile the Jan 6 committee dropped the first bomb: during the insurrection Trump made zero (0) calls..no DOJ, no National Guard...zilch..

“Yea..good luck with that..lol“

SAR , I believe the case has been settled.

Erotic

I appreciate your points and yes McConnell and anyone, (could care less their party affiliation), who is remotely involved in anyway should be looked at.

Want to see some folks shit some bricks.... There should be a non partisan search of ALL federal agency e-mails for anything that involved the leading up to, the day of, and days after January 6th.

You will never get that though because the committee in charge of the investigation is not going to investigate ALL of it's own legislative body (including the committee members), Republican, Democrat or Independent!

I think every person in America wants and deserves to know ALL the facts. Unfortunately in the eyes of many in this country they will look at this committee as one with little to no credibility. And why is that you might ask?

The moment Pelosi rejected Jordan and Banks the partisan BS began.

One can argue that those two are closely aligned with Trump, so be it, that is why you have a committee of many on both sides.

The arguments could be made in the other direction as well considering three democratic members on the committee were involved in impeachment hearings of Trump, Zoe Lofgren, Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskin.

The point being, Pelosi set the stage and McCarthy drove an additional doubt of credibility by pulling all the Republicans from the committee. In return Pelosi appointed two token Republicans (Cheney and Kinzinger - both who voted to impeach Trump) to the committee, leaving three seats vacant (imagine if you will, the roles being were reversed, the Democrats would have lost their minds). Those actions by Pelosi and McCarthy have thrown doubt on the committees integrity. Regardless of the outcome of the findings and actions the committee recommends, the committee will be viewed by many as illegitimate.

From DTH "News reports indicate that in the days before the attack, House sergeant-at-arms Paul Irving resisted calls from the Capitol Police to bring in the National Guard for extra security at the Capitol because of “optics.” Irving later testified that intelligence reports didn’t show the need for the extra security, not that he rejected it because of optics. "

Now add the Capitol Police Force was not trained properly on field force issues and totally bungled the entire situation.. YES they were told to bring in National Guard and Refused and YES this is first hand info from those who work in DC!

Any other LEO who did what they did in shooting would be prosecuted hands down.. and YES I am a LEO Police Shooting expert and have testified in dozens of shooting and handled 100's more !

Yea..good luck with that..lol

Washington DC Is Paying $1.6 Million In Settlements To Rioters At Trump’s Inauguration

Democrats get paid to riot .

@DTH

First off, I appreciate the civil conversation. It is refreshing.

Let me see if I can follow your logic.

Sund, as the police chief gets in touch with House and Senate at-arms people. He requests that they call in the National Guard. They, or as you want to state, the House guy says no. You are implying that Pelosi influenced the guy to not do it. Did I get that correct?

So let's look at more of this . . .

First and foremost, only TRUMP could have called in the National Guard in DC. That is it. Nothing more, nothing less. The DC National Guard reports only to the President.

So following the trail a little here . . . Sund talks to both Sargent's. One reports to Pelosi, the other to McConnell. Why would you not want to investigate McConnell or would you? Would it not be THEIR responsibility to take it up with Trump?

But at the end of the day . . . this is still a diversion.

A group of people stormed the capital. If you are arguing that they would not have because the national guard was there . . . hmm. If you do not think that the Kent State shootings were still on peoples minds and the photo of Mary Vecchio, you might want to see why no one would want that.

Again, regardless if the national guard was there or not does not change the fact of the plan by the oath keepers. It does not change the storming. It does not change much at all. If anything changes, it will be a 'WALL' will be built. It will be built to keep crazy rabid people out.

Rudy is going down..lol..but he will go all the way to the Supreme Court by Marriott..

In your example, the Republicans are also the drug dealers...

AOC , ya know the waitress that brings nothing to the table , was getting texts weeks prior that there was going to be trouble , she admitted it .

Erotic

The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker, or Pelosi at the time of the attack. The Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader — on Jan. 6, Sen. Mitch McConnell.

News reports indicate that in the days before the attack, House sergeant-at-arms Paul Irving resisted calls from the Capitol Police to bring in the National Guard for extra security at the Capitol because of “optics.” Irving later testified that intelligence reports didn’t show the need for the extra security, not that he rejected it because of optics.

@DTH

Uhh . . . because she is not in charge of the police?

uscp. gov/the-department/oversight/capitol-police-board

That is who is in charge of the police in the capitol.

That is like me demanding Jeff Bezos telling me why the line is so long at 7-11.

You are falling for the diversion tactic. Those people are grandstanding to try and deflect. But hey . . . let's play the game a little . . . :)

I guess the black woman (Breona Taylor) who was shot in her home by cops was at fault because she should have known that drug dealers were near her neighborhood and should have had better security to keep the cops out from killing her. Sounds pretty absurd doesn't it. That is the same argument that those republicans are making.

Erotic

I stand corrected, it is a select group of Republicans that are demanding answers from Pelosi as they know full well a committee appointed by her is not going to compel her to answer any questions or turn over documents related to Jan 6th

The letter is in an article from this site

www dot breitbart dot com/politics/2022/01/04/cover-up-house-republicans-demand-nancy-pelosi-answer-for-failures-to-secure-capitol-on-january-6/

Georgia is asking for a grand jury as well..for you know..election interference...

"I am all for equality, will the committee do the same for Pelosi? Since she refuses to answer questions about Jan 6th that the committee requested will the committee request she have her e-mails, documents etc.... with anything related to Jan 6th, (before, on, or after)?"

Substantiate that comment. If that were the case . . . holy shit . . . that would be HUGE news.

Sar

I am all for equality, will the committee do the same for Pelosi? Since she refuses to answer questions about Jan 6th that the committee requested will the committee request she have her e-mails, documents etc.... with anything related to Jan 6th, (before, on, or after)?