We found a fox in the henhouse. Less than 45 days he went from hunter to hunted. No brotherhood, no blue-bond, no "good ol boy" politics. There are lines you do not cross in the south, and if you do.... We make sure Justice is swift.
I think the release of the 13 year oldest interviews confirms what we knew all along.
They do not intend to admit there is anything else to release, unless the evidence that they have it is undeniable. Then they find that, and only that.
So to get more, we have to know what it already is.
Correction noted. They've also clawed back a bunch, some 65,000 pages, after survivors, their families, and attorneys complained that personal information wasn't redacted.
Is it in these "heavily redacted" documents that provide evidence of such misdeeds by Trump?
If so, how did you come by this knowledge? Who told you what's under the redactions?
Was it a Congress-critter who said so, lile Adam Schiff who claimed FOR YEARS that there was damning evidence of Trump-Russia collusion?
If so, why didn't any of them take notes in the SCIF (they're allowed to) and then go on the floor of the house/senate and publically state the details (where they are shielded from prosecution?)
From window "These goobers perhaps need a reminder that large numbers of the Epstein files have not been released or have been so heavily redacted as to make them worthless, and there are many instances where we know the redactions are not of victim's names or other identifying information.”"
So...... What does that have to do with the DOJ bringing charges against perpetrators? Any of them? Hell, one of them..
"No files have since been released"
Correction: when it was noted that some documents referred to the interviews of the 13-year old that hadn't been released, the DOJ barfed those up.
I don't understand your inability to mature. You are in the twilight of your life & acting like the 15 year old fat girl in the lowest popularity click....
You have never adapted... You are a perpetual adolescent...
Mmhmm.
Tell everyone once more how you “set on 5 boards.”
If i compared you to Hem and Haw, i would choose Haw. He was the slowest to adapt.
I'm*
You’ have no clue what i’n talking about because it’s a book. What a laughable comment.
Some are incapable of accepting, there is no spoon..
Sure, but they don't read and retain even less, particularly if it conflicts with their carefully constructed bubble. Plus, I have most of them blocked (or they've blocked me).
However, here is CNN's concise summary from mid-March: "Some 2.5 million documents in the Justice Department’s investigative files on late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been publicly released, and many of the 3.5 million pages that have been published are heavily redacted, prompting questions about what’s being kept from the public."
No files have since been released, so that information is still good.
As I pointed out to 2out, we only know who a few of the perpetrators are because a legislator who had seen some of the unredacted pages named them.
“ These goobers perhaps need a reminder that large numbers of the Epstein files have not been released or have been so heavily redacted as to make them worthless, and there are many instances where we know the redactions are not of victim's names or other identifying information.”
Some are incapable of understanding who moved their cheese.
These goobers perhaps need a reminder that large numbers of the Epstein files have not been released or have been so heavily redacted as to make them worthless, and there are many instances where we know the redactions are not of victim's names or other identifying information.
Oh yes, the Epstein files, a gorrilian pages of the worst human behavior Imaginable... And how many Americans have been charged and arrested for the crimes committed? How many people were named besides DJT , that do not have criminal indictments? How many celebrities?
But..... DJT is the only one anyone really wants to crucify... That's the real problem... Either they are all guilty, or none of them are.
LOL
Yeah, because you gave Clinton, Obama, and Biden thr same courtesy.
Hypocrite.
I said a million based on comments by Thomas Massie and Jamie Raskin.
When you run a search, it shows the total number of mentions. I guess you’ve been in such an echo chamber, that you missed when donald said he grabs women by the pussy.
Donald also has 27 credible complaints from women he has assaulted. There are the countless NDA’s he forces on people,
"NBC News" is mentioned over 100 times in the Epstein files....I guess we should call it the Pedo Network now....or is that not how this works?
“Don't we need to know WHAT/IF Trump did anything immoral concerning Epstein before we decide?”
100%! Absolutely. So you agree we should continue with this probe? Or should we just close the book and move on?
Your post sure makes it sound like you want to the books closed and never looked into again.
And, hey, maybe Trump is innocent. Unlikely, but maybe. However, he's doing a lot of shit to make people drop the issue of Epstein.
Would you be that generous with anyone else?
"So how did the New York Times gain access to this info? Is their info accurate? "
You have more brain power than most of the lunatic cultists posting here, but, like them, you don't read, so you're equally ignorant.
HOW DID THEY GAIN ACCESS?
Well, son, the motherfucking DOJ released a bunch of files and, as one does, the NYT grabbed them, did a word search for "Trump" and came up with more than 38,000 entries.
So, accurate enough for discussion.
As for the rest of your ridiculousness, are you serious? Seriously? It's like you've stuck your head in a sack and are proclaiming that there's clearly nothing to see. But, hey, I guess that's what cultists are like.
Don't we need to know WHAT/IF Trump did anything immoral concerning Epstein before we decide?
Or are we just gonna guess at shit and hang him over what we THINK he may have done?
“If there was anything REAL there. Trump would be behind bars already.”
Maybe he did nothing wrong, criminally? But any legal culpability or lack there of should not ignore moral misgivings on this subject. Which is basically what you’re lobbying for.
You seem to show a blind allegiance for Trump, that would not be extended to others.
You’ve demonstrated yet again why people say you’re in a cult.
Well, Trump was adjudicated in civil court as a sexual assaulter, so there's that...
So what did Trump actually do concerning Epstein. His name was mentioned. Big fuckin deal. 38,000 times or was it toxics 2 million. Maybe another report that said 1 million. Holy shit he was mentioned! Lock him up!
No matter whether he was mentioned once or a million times. What did he do? Do you know? Many of you have him labeled as a pedo and rapist over this. Well did he? Do you know this? Have you read the files? Have they released this proof that Trump was a bad boy? So how did the New York Times gain access to this info? Is their info accurate? (Hell nobody knows anymore)
If there was anything REAL there. Trump would be behind bars already.
