QAnon got doxxed

How does anyone believe the q anon garbage anyway lol another hilarious group

212screwyou2 maga dont know, maga cant work...why bother.

Lack of curiosity bothers me, but this is active rejection of knowledge. Am I the only one who finds that immensely disturbing?

Anyway, here's how Wikipedia works: opinions are not allowed, everything needs to be sourced, anyone can edit, and all revisions are kept and can be discussed.

So for example, when you look at the history at

en. wikipedia. org/w/index.php?title=QAnon&offset=&limit=500&action=history

You can see a QAnon supporter coming in and finding horrendous bias that needs to be corrected just yesterday!

Name of the user: "Naturalresident lawoftheland notadmiralty notmaritime" (uh-oh)

First edit: changed

"''QAnon''{{efn|The term originally referred to the anonymous poster "Q", but some media outlets have started to use the compound "QAnon" as a collective term for either the conspiracy theory or the community driving and discussing it.}} "

to

"''QAnon''{{efn|The term originally referred to the anonymous poster "Q", but some media outlets have started to use the compound "QAnon" as a collective term for either the conspiracy theory rather than just the community driving and discussing it, even though this does not make any logical or grammatical sense - since Qanon represents people/group/a movement, just like the group [[anonymous]], but this anonymous group (anon for short) pertains specifically to Q, thereby generating the term Qanon.}} ({{IPAc-en|?|k|j|u?|?|'|n|?|n}})represents a movement or a group of people, similar to the group [[anonymous]], but this anonymous (or anon for short) group pertains specifically to the online posts of an apparent political insider or insiders using the username “Q” (also the 17th letter of the English alphabet), thereby generating the compound term “Qanon.” Due to the stigma and connotations associated with the pejorative, the movement has been labelled as a [[far-right politics|far-right]] [[conspiracy theory]] even though Q, anon, and Qanon cannot pertain to a “theory” in any sense of the word, because they all represent a movement consisting of a group consisting of people who support and proliferate the postings of a person or persons who identify online as “Q.”. Notwithstanding, opponents in the media have adopted this term when referring to “Qanon.” "

No, seriously, go look -- there's much more. Lunacy like that usually just gets rolled back. And usually, as in this case, the original editor tries again, and again, and again while throwing fits about bias, and conspiracies before either giving up, getting blocked or (very rarely) actually trying to source things.

Anyway, the upshot is that when Wikipedia says

"It alleges that a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against President Donald Trump, who is battling against the cabal. The theory also commonly asserts that Trump is planning a day of reckoning known as "The Storm", when thousands of members of the cabal will be arrested. No part of the theory is based on fact."

...that is not opinion, or embellishment, or ridicule, or exaggeration. That is literally what QAnon believes, and no, not a single shred of it has any proof. Hell, they're even leaving out the part where the pedophiles are also cannibals. And that the Dalai Lama is in on it. And Tom Hanks. And the Pope.

Imagine believing in a conspiracy....a vast right wing one at that..... and having people vote for you for president?
.
Who is nuttier? .....the believer of a conspiracy......or the people who voted for the believer of a conspiracy?

Lol , again I could care less.

"The Left"? This is Wikipedia.

Do you know how Wikipedia works?

Sar , where does Manilla have with Q . Is that something you heard on a left leaning radio in NY. I see the people at the Trump rallies and you would not even know it but some will wear shirts with a big Q
I try to respect all non violent people and they are always pleasant . If you EVER go their website and I did not know where to look till I asked a Q person ...There is nothing that you would consider radical , no encouraging of any kind of violence or malice.
Now their are sites out there that reference Q that are weird .

I dont expect anyone to look things up for me.

Lol , I am aware of what the left thinks of Q .

What an interesting double standard. People linking to reputable news sources can be dismissed by "FAKE NEWS" without any actual counterargument, but when you say things like

"Quite a lot of people do think that Q is Trump himself . Keep in mind that Q may be one person and Qanon is another. I dont know anything about the website or board that they post on but have a friend at work that talks about it. I have heard Q only posts on one platform and not on facebook or any other social media."

...you expect people to look things up for you.

At best, you are the laziest hypocrite I have encountered in a good, long while.

Let me help you: Q posted on 4chan. That took fifteen seconds to find out.

And for those blissfully unaware of what QAnon is, let me help you too:

QAnon[a] (/?kju??'n?n/) is a far-right conspiracy theory. It alleges that a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against President Donald Trump, who is battling against the cabal. The theory also commonly asserts that Trump is planning a day of reckoning known as "The Storm", when thousands of members of the cabal will be arrested. No part of the theory is based on fact.

I never expect anyone to accept what I say here , most people can think for themselves .

So you denounce ABC, NPR, Fox News, Wikipedia, CNN et cetera as sources, but you expect people to accept something you, a source proven to be unreliable to begin with, have merely HEARD. Is that correct?

Yes I hear that !

"I have heard Q only posts on one platform and not on facebook or any other social media."

You've HEARD?

We know who the q are.. look them up.. They fled to Manilla. As far Trump supporters look at the rallies.. no need to go in detail.. Lol

New Yorkers normaly get things mixed up .

Sar.....” Qs are some uneducated morbidly obese incells living in basements...thats it.”

I think you are getting Antifa and Q mixed up. Lmfao

Sar you may want to rethink your education status .

Sar , tell me where you have seen them . The ones I see are all pretty young and the women are pleasant and attractive . They don’t go out promoting Q , for them it is a matter of fact . Where have you seen them?

"educated and seem pretty religious" - you can not use these words in the same sentence...lol. Qs are some uneducated morbidly obese incells living in basements...thats it.

I run into the Q people at Trump rallies always very nice people . People of all ages and colors . I don’t understand it. I have been told exactly what you have said there is only one authentic website. I go there and it is somewhat confusing , but I have seen things from the site come true . The Q people I have met are educated and seem pretty religious ......

Quite a lot of people do think that Q is Trump himself . Keep in mind that Q may be one person and Qanon is another.
I dont know anything about the website or board that they post on but have a friend at work that talks about it.
I have heard Q only posts on one platform and not on facebook or any other social media.

@Sar , to be honest if you go to their website a lot of what they say comes true .....Now who is Q is it Trump .

do I look I care about Q...lol...somebody, somewhere will doxx them again.

@Sar......be careful what you say about Q . I am not a Q person but I know a few . Somebody is putting up fake Q websites . I know we see all this crazy stuff but if you go to their actual website it doesn’t resemble anything like you talk about . Somebody is trying to harm them. .